Study of Technical Qualification Evaluation for Construction Work Tender on Under Bid Price Contract
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v12i1.716Keywords:
Under Bid Price Contract, Major Equipment, Managerial Personnel, ImpactAbstract
Based on data from LPSE Padang City for the 2021 and 2022 fiscal years, it was found that one third of the work packages in those fiscal year had an Under Bid Price Contract (UBPC) or an offer with less than 80% of the Owner’s Estimate (OE). The purpose of this study is to examine the conformity between field implementation and technical qualification documents in construction work tenders with less than 80% OE or under bid price contracts in Padang City and its impact on small qualifications. Qualitative analysis based on the results of interviews with implementing contractors from several institutions or agencies involved in the procurement process of goods/services in Padang City was used in this study. This study only focuses on the technical qualifications of construction work tenders on under bid price contracts in Padang City using the tender method and the one-envelope method with a small category Construction Services Business License for the 2023 Fiscal Year. The results of the study show that qualification documents and contract documents with HPS of less than 80% in the implementation in the field are still appropriate. The results of interviews with seven contractors showed that the main equipment and managerial personnel used were also still appropriate. The profit target has been achieved by 4 out of 7 respondents (57.14%) and the remaining 3 out of 7 respondents did not get any profit, this is known from the end of the contract period. 3 out of 7 respondents (42.86%) have minor disabilities and 4 out of 7 respondents do not have minor disabilities. 7 respondents (100%) also did not experience delays in work. 3 out of 7 respondents experienced one contract addendum and the remaining 4 out of 7 experienced two contract addendums.
Downloads
References
Oxford Economics, “Future of Construction,” Oxford Econ., no. August, pp. 1–49, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://raconteur.uberflip.com/i/1157282-future-of-construction-2019/7?
Direktorat Penyusunan APBN, “Anggaran Infrastruktur 2015 - 2022,” Direktorat Penyusunan APBN, 2022. [Online]. Available: data-apbn.kemenkeu.go.id/Dataset/Details/1014
H. R. Kerzner, Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=QgQQC5qRtzgC&pgis=1
D. J. Watt, B. Kayis, and K. Willey, “The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.04.003.
M. F. Mirhadi, S. A. Terouhid, and M. R. A. Jokar, “Managerial Evaluation of Construction Contractors in the Selection Process,” no. April, 2015.
N. Semaan and M. Salem, “A deterministic contractor selection decision support system for competitive bidding,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 24, no. January, pp. 61–77, 2017, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-06-2015-0094.
Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, “Peraturan LKPP Nomor 12 Tahun 2021,” Jar. Dokumentasi dan Inf. Huk. BPK RI, vol. 1, p. 36, 2021.
R. A. Wibowo, “Mencegah Korupsi di Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa : Apa yang sudah dan yang masih harus dilakukan?,” Integritas, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 37, 2015.
S. Wibowo, “Persekongkolan Tender dalam Pengadaan Barang Jasa secara Elektronik pada Pekerjaan Jasa Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2020),” J. Huk. Caraka Justitia, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 75–94, 2022.
A. Subrata, M. Halimah, and M. B. Alexandri, “Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan Nilai Penawaran Di Bawah 80 % Terhadap Kualitas Pekerjaan Konstruksi Di Kabupaten Bandung,” Responsive, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 155, 2021, doi: 10.24198/responsive.v3i3.31859.
A. M. Yusuf, “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan,” 4th ed., Jakarta: Kencana, 2014, p. 372. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=RnA-DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false
J. C. Young et al., “A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research,” Methods Ecol. Evol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2018, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12828.
Kementerian PUPR RI, No. 14 Tahun 2020 tentang Standar dan Pedoman Pengadaan Jasa Konstruksi Melalui Penyedia. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://jdih.pu.go.id/detail-dokumen/2749/1
I. Ahmaddien, Praktis Evaluasi Jasa Konstruksi Pokja Pemilihan, vol. 2. Bandung, 2021.
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, “Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Atas Belanja Daerah Tahun Anggaran 2023 (S.D. 30 November pada Pemerintah Kota Padang),” no. 54, p. 115, 2024.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adel Emir Fuadi Harahap, Benny Hidayat, Akhmad Suraji

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.