Evaluation Study of Risk Management Process in The Business Process National Road Implementation Center (BPJN) West Sumatra

Authors

  • Detia Enda Trivilla Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
  • Akhmad Suraji Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
  • Bayu Martanto Adji Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v12i1.706

Keywords:

Risk Management, Infrastructure Projects, National Roads

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of risk management implementation in national road infrastructure projects managed by the National Road Implementation Agency (BPJN) of West Sumatra, Indonesia. Employing an evaluative method that integrates qualitative and quantitative approaches, this research assesses risk management practices based on the guidelines set by the Ministry of Public Works and Housing. The study utilizes document reviews, structured interviews, and perception surveys involving at least 10 respondents, including Risk Owners, Risk Managers, and officials from the Risk Management Unit (UPR) responsible for planning, financial management, and technical operations. Findings indicate that while BPJN West Sumatra has effectively implemented several risk management aspects, deficiencies persist in risk monitoring and response strategies. Notably, the study highlights the urgent need for a structured risk monitoring system, more proactive mitigation strategies, enhanced stakeholder communication, and the integration of information technology. This research contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive evaluation framework for risk management effectiveness in infrastructure projects, offering practical recommendations to improve risk management capacity and support the successful execution of national road infrastructure projects in West Sumatra.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. R. Rustam, Risk Management principles, applications, and research. Salemba Four, 2017.

E. R. Fisk, Construction Project Administration. Prentice Hall, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=fHAeAQAAIAAJ

C. B. Chapman and Dale. F. Cooper, Risk analysis: Testing some prejudices, vol. 83. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1983.

C. F. Gray and E. W. Larson, Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=g5MCPwAACAAJ

P. Guide, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute, 2008.

H. Darmawi, Risk Management. Literary Earth, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Nz1lEAAAQBAJ

H. R. Kerzner, Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 2013.

R. Flanagan and G. Norman, Risk Management and Construction. Wiley, 1993. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CPMaX2dikTAC

Yth, SURAT EDARAN MENTERI PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA.

Indonesia, Surat Edaran Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 04/SE/M/2021 Tahun 2021 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Manajemen Risiko di Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. Indonesia: Kementerian PUPR., 2021.

Inspektur Jenderal Kementerian PUPR, Pedoman Evaluasi Tingkat Efektivitas Penerapan Manajemen Risiko di Kementerian PUPR. Indonesia: Surat Inspektur Jenderal Kementerian PUPR , 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Trivilla, D. E., Suraji, A., & Adji, B. M. (2025). Evaluation Study of Risk Management Process in The Business Process National Road Implementation Center (BPJN) West Sumatra. CIVED, 12(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v12i1.706

Issue

Section

Articles