Analysis of the Causes of Deviations in the Implementation of Construction Work Contracts Based on Verdict
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v11i3.641Keywords:
Construction Contract Issues, Disputes Under a Construction Contract, Construction Contract, Construction Law CaseAbstract
Construction Work is the whole or part of the activities that include the construction, operation, maintenance, demolition, and rebuilding that are regulated in a Construction Contract. In the implementation of the Construction Contract, several problems cause deviations. The purpose of this research is to analyze the causes of deviations in a Construction Contract based on Verdict. The research data was obtained from the Supreme Court Repository page by searching for Verdict related to implementing Construction Contracts. The limitation of this research is a case that has been decided in the last 10 years in the District Court in West Sumatra. The search results obtained 9 verdicts. The method used to analyze the data is the Rich Picture Diagram (RPD). Validation and refinement are carried out using the Interview method from the results of secondary data analysis. The outcome of this research is the causes of deviations that are prejudicial to one of the parties and thus fall under civil law such as The occurrence of delays caused by: Contractor negligence during implementation, Contractor achievements not paid by the Owner, negligence of the Planner Consultant, the state of the land is not by the drawing plan, continuous heavy rain that disrupts the work, Kurs strengthen sharply, land acquisition has not been completed by the Owner, the Contractor is not given the opportunity 50 days of completion; Disputes caused by: Owner made unilateral changes to Technical Specifications, Supervisory Consultant's mistake in reporting progress.
Downloads
References
R. Fauzan, B. Hidayat, and A. Suraji, “Deviasi Kontrak dalam Proyek Konstruksi: Sebuah Analisis Berbasis Temuan Audit Kinerja Inspektorat Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat,” J. Manaj. dan Ilmu Adm. Publik, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 324–333, 2023, doi: 10.24036/jmiap.v5i3.898.
B. R. Winanda, T. Ophiyandri, and D. I. Prihantony, “Persepsi Owner Terhadap Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Jalan Kabupaten Di Provinsi Sumatera Barat,” pp. 139–156, 2016.
N. Yasin, Kontrak Konstruksi di Indonesia, Ed.2, Cet3. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2014.
J. O. Simanjuntak, “Fakultas Teknik Universitas HKBP Nommensen , Medan Abstrak Undang-Undang No . 2 Tahun 2017 3 tentang Jasa Konstruksi pasal 1 ayat 8 menyatakan bahwa kontrak kerja konstruksi adalah keseluruhan dokumen kontrak yang mengatur hubungan hukum antara pengguna j,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 205–214, 2021.
S. R. Slamet, “Kesempurnaan Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Menghindari Sengketa,” Lex Jurnalica, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 191–208, 2016.
A. A. Shash and S. I. Habash, “Disputes in Construction Industry: Owners and Contractors’ Views on Causes and Remedies,” J. Eng. Proj. Prod. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–51, 2021, doi: 10.2478/jeppm-2021-0005.
T. Dao, “Several Legal Issues,” vol. 11, no. March, pp. 210–216, 2020.
M. A. Priyambodo, “(Mekanisme Penyelesian Sengketa Konstruksi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Konstruksi),” vol. 01, no. 03, 2021.
R. G. Wicaksono, A. B. P. Gawei, and V. H. Puspasari, “Identifikasi Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpotensi Menjadi Penyebab Timbulnya Sengketa Pada Proyek Konstruksi Di Kota Palangka Raya,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 168–176, 2019.
M. S. Salim H.S., S.H., Hukum Kontrak: Teori & Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. Sinar Grafika, 2008.
C. Tanriverdi, G. Atasoy, I. Dikmen, and M. T. Birgonul, “Causal mapping to explore emergence of construction disputes,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 288–302, 2021, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2021.14900.
R. Taufik, P. Citra Dewi, K. Widina, and A. Anwar, “Analisis Banjir di Kota Bandung dengan Pemodelan Sistem Rich Picture Diagram,” J. Inov. Masy., vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 202–210, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://bandungkota.bps.go.id/.
M. Sutrisna and P. Barrett, “Applying rich picture diagrams to model case studies of construction projects,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 164–179, 2007, doi: 10.1108/09699980710731281.
A. W. Adawiyah, “Analisa Pengaruh Paket Wisata Destinasi Pangalengan Terhadap Keuntungan Berdasarkan Skenario Pemodelan Menggunakan Aplikasi Anylogic (Studi Kasus : PT. Java Wisata),” J. Ilm. Multidisipline, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 2986–6340, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8045293.
S. Hansen, “Investigasi Teknik Wawancara dalam Penelitian Kualitatif Manajemen Konstruksi,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 283, 2020, doi: 10.5614/jts.2020.27.3.10.
H. Chandraresmi et al., “Kajian mengenai gugatan melawan hukum terhadap sengketa wanprestasi,” vol. V, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2017.
LKPP, “Peraturan LKPP No.12 Tahun 2021,” 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Qorri 'Ainaqi, Taufika Ophiyandri, Benny Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2.jpg)
