Analysis of Implementation Factors and Constraints of Occupational Health and Safety in Multi-Story Building Construction Projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v11i1.29Keywords:
multi-storey building construction projects, implementation of K3, obstacles to implementing K3Abstract
The implementation of occupational safety and health is one of the key factors in construction project execution, and fundamentally, construction projects involve many hazardous elements. This research aims to analyze the implementation factors and challenges that occur in the application of occupational safety and health (OSH) in high-rise building construction projects by distributing questionnaires to contractors and consultants to obtain data for subsequent analysis. Based on data analysis, nine implementation factors and obstacles in OSH application in building projects were identified, namely workplace safety in the project (X1), equipment and work attire (X2), fire safety (X3), protection of the public (X4), worker health (X5), worker communication (X6), general factors (X7), obstacles from the company's perspective (X8), and obstacles from the worker's perspective (X9). These results were then tested for validity and reliability to determine their validity and reliability, and they were analyzed using descriptive analysis and Pearson correlation analysis. The results of the descriptive analysis indicate that the highest or most frequently implemented OSH factor is the protection of the public (X4) with a mean value of 3.725 and a standard deviation of 0.459. Among the obstacles to OSH implementation, the highest or most frequently occurring factor is the obstacles from the company's perspective (X8) with a mean value of 3.620 and a standard deviation of 0.500. The results of the Pearson correlation analysis show that equipment and work attire (X2) and protection of the public (X4) have the highest correlation value, which is 0.825, indicating a very strong relationship.
Downloads
References
D. Wynalda And H. Sulistio, “Analisis Korelasi Faktor-Faktor Penerapan K3 Terhadap Tingkat Kecelakaan Dan Tingkat Keparahan Pada Proyek Konstruksi,” Pp. 54–61, 2013, Doi: 10.24912/jmts.v1i1.2257.
I. N. D. P. Putra, “Land Value Estimation Model As Impact Of Infrastructure Development In Kaliwates Jember Indonesia,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., Vol. 9, No. 11, Pp. 1016–1030, 2018.
I. N. D. P. Putra, Y. S. Amalia, And G. A. M. K. Dewi, “Framework Of Construction Procedure Manual Of The Project Management Unit And Other Stakeholders In The Surabaya City Government,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Eng. Technol., Vol. 10, No. 6, Pp. 174–182, 2019, Doi: 10.34218/Ijaret.10.6.2019.021.
R. Maretnowati, A. Azizi, And S. Anjarwati., “Analisis Pelaksanaan Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung K Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto.” 2020, Doi: 10.30595/civeng.v1i2.9298.
C. M. Br Sinulingga, Dewantoro, And V. P. Happy, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penghambat Kontraktor Dalam Penerapan Sistem Manajemen K3 Pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung Di Palangka Raya,” J. Serambi Eng., Vol. Viii, No. 1, Pp. 4327–4333, 2023, Doi: 10.32672/jse.v8i1.5527.
Z. R. Wardana Et Al., “Analisis Percepatan Proyek Menggunakan Metode Fast Track Dan Metode Crashing Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Bertingkat,” Vol. 10, No. 2, Pp. 491–500, 2023, Doi: 10.24036/cived.v10i2.124086.
V. P. K. Lengkong And L. O. H. Dotulong, “The Effects Of Work Safety, Work Health, Work Environment On The Employee Productivity In Pt. Air Manado,” Pengaruh… 4145 J. Emba, Vol. 5, No. 3, Pp. 4145–4154, 2017, Doi: 10.35794/emba.v5i3.18374.
E. Kurniawati, “Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Pada Proyek Konstruksi Di Kota Bandung,” 2018.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan Kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.
M. . Morissan, Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rully Akbar Kelly, I Nyoman Pahang Dita Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.